Incident intelligence

From a production alert
to a reviewable fix.

DebugFlow unifies production signals, correlates them with your multi-repo codebase, and proposes fixes your team can review and merge — so engineers spend less time investigating and more time shipping.

Multi-repo Multiple signal sources SaaS or self-hosted
What it is

When the incident crosses services

Siloed tools show fragments of the problem; engineers spend hours correlating logs, tickets, and code by hand.

DebugFlow is an incident intelligence platform for engineering teams. It links production signals to your code, uses AI to produce a readable root cause, and supports assisted remediation with suggestions that flow into your team's review process. On top of that, it gathers the surrounding context — repositories, documentation, and operations — so you can move from the alert to the next step with less manual investigation.

Today
Fragmented investigation

Jumping between consoles and chats to assemble the story of an incident slows the response and exhausts the team. In a 30-engineer org, four hours per week per engineer on cross-service debugging adds up to roughly ~$500k per year in salary spent on triage.

With DebugFlow
A shorter path to the fix

Start from a single view: what failed, where in the system, and which parts of the code deserve attention first — backed by retrieval across all your repositories.

Capabilities

From signal to action

Three blocks that cover what most engineering teams actually need — without promising a thousand integrations on day one.

01
Unified ingest
Alerts, logs, and ticket work in one place.
Connect what your team already uses
Sentry, structured logs, GitHub issues — fewer copy-pastes between tools when piecing together an incident.
Free-text when you need it
Stack traces and notes flow through the same pipeline, with no requirement for a perfect integration on day one.
02
Understanding
Priority and a readable explanation.
Useful classification
Separate noise from what needs attention now — without depending on whichever specialist happens to be online.
A narrative of the problem
A clear timeline from the symptom to the likely spot in code or architecture, with the relevant commit highlighted.
03
Code and next steps
Multi-repo context and a clean handoff to the team.
Search across your ecosystem
Surface symbols, services, and docs that matter without walking every repository by hand. Tree-sitter chunks plus hybrid search keep retrieval accurate at scale.
Assisted remediation
Suggested patches arrive as Pull Requests in your review flow — you decide what ships to production.
Why it exists

A loop, not another dashboard

The point is to close the loop: from the signal to shared understanding to the next step in code — with fewer alignment meetings and fewer "does anyone remember where this was deployed?" moments.

unified context readable explanation multi-repo cloud or your environment
How we deliver

Two ways to run it

Pick the model that fits your data policy and your team's pace.

SaaS
We operate the platform

Quick start, continuous updates, and less operational surface for your team to maintain.

Ideal for early iteration
Fewer moving parts to run
Self-hosted
You control the environment

When data and code must stay inside your perimeter — for regulatory reasons or by choice.

Data stays in your control
Aligns with internal policies
Cloud-native, AWS-ready

DebugFlow is built as a set of stateless containers backed by a managed Postgres database, a vector store, and object storage — a shape that maps cleanly to AWS ECS/EC2, RDS for PostgreSQL, S3, and ElastiCache for Redis. The same architecture is what we deploy in customers' VPCs under the self-hosted option, so SaaS and self-hosted share one operational model.

Who it's for

Teams that live in production

VPs of Engineering and CTOs at fintechs, healthtechs, and mid-sized e-commerce companies — where multiple services and repositories show up in the same incident.

Distributed architecture

Incidents that don't fit inside a single service or a single repository.

Availability pressure

When every minute counts and context has to be shared fast across the on-call rotation.

Data requirements

When "just use the cloud tool" doesn't pass internal governance or compliance.

Next step

A conversation and a fit assessment

We align on expectations, your technical scenario, and a pilot format — no commitment on the first call.

1
Alignment

Team context, current stack, and where the pain is.

2
Pilot

Validation on a real scenario, on your timeline.

3
Scale

Expansion and operation under the chosen model.

Want to see whether it fits your team?

Send us an email and we'll come back with next steps.

Talk to the team